The iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge’s greatest compromises make them a no-go for me

It appears like

iPhone 17
rumors are hitting continuous as of late, which is smart — we’re about 4 months out from launch, so {hardware} particulars have to be locked down forward of mass manufacturing. It takes fairly some time to churn out the tens of millions of items Apple must fulfill worldwide launch demand.

The newest rumor (by way of The Information), is that so as to obtain its ultra-thin 5.5mm physique, the

iPhone 17 Air
will sport a critical compromise in battery life. How a lot? Allegedly, Apple’s inside testing means that simply 60 to 70% of homeowners will be capable of make it a full day on a single cost, down from about 80 to 90% for different iPhone fashions. The corporate is even mentioned to be making ready a brand new battery case, one thing it hasn’t provided for the reason that discontinued MagSafe Battery Pack.

Comparable rumors have emerged round Samsung’s

Galaxy S25 Edge
. In line with WinFuture, the cellphone might have a 3,900mAh battery — that is extra capability than the iPhone 16, however beneath the common S25’s 4,000mAh, and far lower than the S25 Extremely’s 5,000mAh. That is put me off each Samsung and Apple’s upcoming “vanguard” telephones, and never simply because everybody prefers larger numbers.

Dealing with the established order

As a tech journalist, I is perhaps an exception, however I discover that the majority telephones nonetheless haven’t got sufficient battery life, by no means thoughts rolling issues again. My present each day driver is an iPhone 16 Professional, which based on Apple, needs to be able to as much as 22 hours of (streaming) video playback. Sounds spectacular, proper? In apply, nevertheless, I am struggling to think about how that might be doable. I wish to placed on Reuters’ video briefing whereas I bathe and alter within the morning, and I will typically see the battery drop to 90% or decrease earlier than I even get downstairs for breakfast. On exercise days, it is doable for the battery to dip beneath 30% by the point I get into mattress, and that is after a 15- to 16-hour day of principally non-video exercise. If I really spent an hour or two streaming YouTube, I would in all probability must put my cellphone in Low Energy Mode in some unspecified time in the future.

I would say it is baffling that Apple and Samsung look like headed within the mistaken course, however actually, it isn’t. Each firms have lengthy put different upgrades forward of battery life. It’s, in concept, doable to make it over a day for those who’ve bought a cellphone just like the Galaxy S25 Extremely or iPhone 16 Professional Max, however solely with gentle utilization. Certainly, battery life has all the time performed second fiddle for many smartphone makers, just because larger batteries are costly whereas being powerful to take advantage of in advertising and marketing campaigns. A 6.9-inch display screen or a 10X telephoto lens is instantly spectacular — it is tougher to wow individuals with an additional two or three hours of runtime.

This yr, it looks like each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the idea that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake. It should entice some individuals, definitely, however we’re not within the 2000s anymore — telephones have been skinny for a very long time. Nobody I do know is complaining about thickness. If something, the difficulty appears to be that telephones have develop into unwieldly, getting thinner whereas concurrently rising taller, wider, and slipperier. Steel and glass could also be good aesthetically — however with no case, skinny units like my iPhone and my spouse’s OnePlus 9 5G really feel like they may slip out of my palms with one mistaken gesture.

Associated

The OnePlus 13R shows OnePlus still needs to figure out budget phones

So near price range nirvana, but to date.

A worrisome course for the long run

Misusing the most recent tech

Each the iPhone 17 Air and S25 Edge could also be based mostly on silicon-carbon batteries, a variation of the lithium-ion batteries we’re used to, merely with larger power density. That hasn’t been confirmed, however the tech has been utilized in just a few telephones already, and now appears poised to go mainstream.

If that’s the case, I am anxious {that a} dangerous precedent is rising. After I first heard about silicon-carbon, my hope was that we might get extra longevity out of telephones the identical measurement, or at the least equal longevity from barely smaller units. Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we might be hit with a wave of copycat units, a few of which can additionally throw battery life underneath the bus. That may take the business backward at a time when persons are extra depending on smartphones than ever.

To be truthful, Apple and Samsung could also be making an attempt to maintain elements prices down and retail costs in verify. Silicon-carbon batteries are costlier to provide in the meanwhile, so even making an attempt to match the capacities of normal lithium-ion batteries could also be troublesome with no chunk into revenue margins. It might be that when manufacturing prices come down, we’ll see capacities go up once more, fulfilling the brand new tech’s promise. Who is aware of — perhaps Apple will really ship a two-day iPhone sooner or later.

Alongside these traces, I am hopeful that each the Air and the Edge will serve a function just like the iPhone X, which Apple launched in 2017. This was the primary iPhone with an OLED show and a

Face ID
digital camera, costing a then-unprecedented $999. Many individuals balked at it, however gross sales of the iPhone X, iPhone XS, and iPhone 11 Professional finally pushed manufacturing prices down, making it doable to place each OLED and Face ID on the $799 iPhone 12. As of late, even the $599

iPhone 16e
shares these options.

Time will inform how briskly the brand new battery tech bridges over to helpful capacities at inexpensive costs, if it does in any respect. I simply know that for now, Apple and Samsung can rely me out of units that cut back battery life with none tangible advantages. It will hardly matter how cool a cellphone seems sliding out of my pocket if I can not make it to the fitness center and again with out plugging into my automotive — or from Alberta to Texas with no battery pack or charging through the flight’s layover. I assume I will nonetheless be bringing my iPad alongside for mid-flight leisure.

You may additionally like

Everything you need to know about PEVs, or personal electric vehicles

You should use PEVs to discover, run errands, or velocity up your commute.