4 causes I am blowing previous the iPhone Air, and why it is best to too

As anticipated, the star product of Apple’s September 9 press occasion was the iPhone Air. There wasn’t a lot left for Apple to disclose about it, the truth is — I already knew, based mostly on leaks, that it could be about 5.6mm thick with a 6.5-inch show, and sport a single rear-facing digicam, regardless of the presence of two or three cameras on the iPhone 17 and 17 Pro. I even knew what it could seem like. Not that there was a lot Apple may’ve finished about that — accent makers wanted blueprints to have merchandise prepared on time.

The cellphone is extra tempting than I believed it could be, however I am additionally fairly comfy about skipping it. You ought to be as nicely, and there are a selection of explanation why. This is hoping that Apple kinds issues out by the point the Air 2 rolls round.

4

Thinness comes on the expense of battery life

Kind over operate

Apple / Pocket-Lint

The most important shock is that the battery life on the Air is not as dangerous as rumors predicted. Apple claims that the system can deal with as much as 27 hours of video playback, placing it on par with my iPhone 16 Pro. That is partly attributable to the Air’s customized C1X modem, which is extra power-efficient than the third-party modems in earlier gadgets. Apple’s benchmarks by no means correspond on to actuality, after all — however it is best to be capable to get by way of a day on a single cost for those who’re not taking part in Resident Evil or taking pictures a variety of 4K video.

What Apple does not let you know is that the Air charges under all the pieces else in its 2025 lineup. The iPhone 17 is rated for 30 hours of playback, and the 17 Professional will get as much as 33. The 17 Professional Max delivers as much as 39 hours — that means that with gentle exercise, it may legitimately be a two-day cellphone.

None of this might matter if it weren’t for the Air’s $1,000 entry worth. You may get a longer-lasting system for much less cash, which is the alternative of how issues usually work. Perhaps Apple will slim the hole subsequent 12 months by switching over to silicon-carbon batteries, which provide increased vitality density.

3

You are sacrificing digicam performance

Consider carefully about the way you shoot photographs and movies

Apple / Pocket-lint

The Air sports activities a 48-megapixel wide-angle digicam, much like the one on the iPhone 17, with the choice of 2x zoom for filling the body a bit higher. For some folks, this can be greater than adequate, permitting them to snap buddies, household, and lots of different topics in excessive element. However not like the 17, there isn’t any ultrawide digicam to talk of. Which means you’ll be able to’t shoot in cramped areas, and even take macro photographs, which might be a dealkiller for those who like to make use of your cellphone to take group pics, or save pairing codes and serial numbers.

As soon as once more, the Air’s pricetag comes into play. You’ll be able to truly save $200 and get an ultra-wide again for those who purchase an iPhone 17. Alternately, by spending $100 extra you’ll be able to improve to the 17 Professional, which incorporates each an ultra-wide and a 48-megapixel telephoto digicam with 8x zoom. When you’re contemplating an Air, you’d higher assume lengthy and exhausting about your digicam wants — you do not wish to end up lacking key recollections as a result of your cellphone lacks primary gear. Even the similarly-designed Galaxy S25 Edge has twin cameras.

2

Sturdiness is a huge query mark

There’s solely thus far materials decisions can go

Apple / Pocket-lint

Apple went to nice lengths to emphasize the toughness of the Air throughout its press occasion. The cellphone not solely sports activities a titanium physique — not like the iPhone 17 and 17 Professional, which use aluminum — however Ceramic Defend glass on each the entrance and the again, supposed to scale back the specter of scratches and cracks. The entrance particularly makes use of Ceramic Defend 2, claimed to have 3 times the scratch resistance of its predecessor.

None of this straight addresses the most important concern with ultra-thin telephones: bending. Titanium could also be stiffer than aluminum, but it surely’s not resistant to strain, and there is solely a lot structural rigidity Apple can present in a tool so skinny. Presumably Apple has realized the teachings of Bendgate, which plagued the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus — but it isn’t exhausting to think about somebody warping or cracking their Air by by chance sitting on it. We’ll have to attend for reviewers to show issues a technique or one other.

I feel I communicate for lots of people after I say that I might moderately have a thicker, heavier cellphone that is rugged than one which (briefly) impresses me with how slim and light-weight it’s. For the sake of consumers, I sincerely hope that Apple’s advertising is greater than hyperbole.

1

It skimps on 5G, graphics, and USB tech

The iPhone 16 Professional may very well be a greater deal

One thing I’ve realized over time is to pay shut consideration to Apple’s specs sheets, as a result of the corporate is not all the time clear with its forward-facing press supplies. Whereas it brags concerning the iPhone 17 having a 120Hz adaptive refresh price, for example, I needed to delve into specs to verify that this permits always-on show (AOD) capabilities like lockscreen widgets and StandBy. I suppose Apple considers this all commonplace now, despite the fact that you continue to get a locked 60Hz with out AOD for those who purchase an iPhone 16 or 16e.

When you’re weighing an Air towards a 17 Professional, it’s possible you’ll be shocked by a few of its compromises, which transcend digicam and battery tech. Whereas each merchandise use an A19 Professional chip, the Air has one much less graphics (GPU) core, which may harm its efficiency in some video games. It additionally does not help the quickest model of 5G, mmWave, and may solely sync wired information at sluggish USB 2.0 speeds. That final level is pathetic, frankly. The two.0 spec dates again to the 12 months 2000, so there isn’t any excuse for any iPhone to have it at present, given the sizes of recent music, video, and backup recordsdata. USB 3.1 needs to be handled at least — not a Professional luxurious.

Contemplate this: the bottom Air is supplied with 256GB of storage. USB 2.0 may make some backups take over an hour, whereas USB 3.1 would shorten that to lower than seven minutes. I get that most individuals depend on Wi-Fi and cloud sync as of late, however that is no excuse for leaving USB customers within the Darkish Ages.